<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CreditFYI Blog &#187; branding in recession</title>
	<atom:link href="http://credit-blog.creditfyi.com/tag/branding-in-recession/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://credit-blog.creditfyi.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:53:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How Brands Try to Woo Customers Back</title>
		<link>http://credit-blog.creditfyi.com/economy/brands-recession-messaging.html</link>
		<comments>http://credit-blog.creditfyi.com/economy/brands-recession-messaging.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dawn Handschuh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding in recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://credit-blog.creditfyi.com/?p=1521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Consumers are still stubbornly clinging onto their hard-earned dollars, so much so that marketers of many national brands are working harder than ever to convince consumers it&#8217;s still worth parting with them.
Procter &#38; Gamble, the New York Times reports, plans to selectively reduce prices on brands it believes are perceived as being expensive compared to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://credit-blog.creditfyi.com/wp-content/uploads/advertisingblog.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1520" src="http://credit-blog.creditfyi.com/wp-content/uploads/advertisingblog-292x300.jpg" alt="" width="292" height="300" /></a></p>
<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Consumers are still stubbornly clinging onto their hard-earned dollars, so much so that marketers of many national brands are working harder than ever to convince consumers it&#8217;s still worth parting with them.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Procter &amp; Gamble, the <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/business/media/03adco.html?ref=business" target="_blank">New York Times</a></em> reports, plans to selectively reduce prices on brands it believes are perceived as being expensive compared to its rivals.<span>  </span>But it will also try to position its products as being a better value. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Consumers, we&#8217;re told, are looking more closely at the spread in prices for different brands offering the same product and making individual choices about what&#8217;s best for them — the dirt-cheap brand, the middle-of-the-road brand or the premium brand.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>As the <em>Times</em> pointed out, &#8220;value&#8221; means different things to different people, and people may differ in their willingness to pay a premium for value for certain purchases.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It reminds me of the old L&#8217;Oreal hair coloring commercials that justified the higher price with the tagline, &#8220;Why? Because I&#8217;m worth it.&#8221;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Some might insist on paying more for good-quality clothing, while for others it&#8217;s a top-of-the-line plasma TV. I guess it really comes down to personal priorities and what&#8217;s important to you.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <em>Are there certain high-end brands you&#8217;re still willing to pay extra for, or has the recession put all things on the table?</em></p>
<p><!--EndFragment--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://credit-blog.creditfyi.com/economy/brands-recession-messaging.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

