Comments on: Lawyer Argues Banks Don’t Have the Right to Foreclose http://credit-blog.creditfyi.com/real-estate/stop-foreclosure-with-this-legal-defense.html Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:59:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: hud reverse mortgage http://credit-blog.creditfyi.com/real-estate/stop-foreclosure-with-this-legal-defense.html/comment-page-1#comment-10111 hud reverse mortgage Sun, 11 Dec 2011 09:14:07 +0000 http://credit-blog.creditfyi.com/?p=1037#comment-10111 <strong>Gems form the internet...</strong> [...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]…... Gems form the internet…

[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……

]]> By: credit fixers http://credit-blog.creditfyi.com/real-estate/stop-foreclosure-with-this-legal-defense.html/comment-page-1#comment-590 credit fixers Wed, 06 May 2009 13:12:31 +0000 http://credit-blog.creditfyi.com/?p=1037#comment-590 Did you know that if you buy a house between Jan1 2009 and Nov 30th 2009 the government will give you up to $8,000 or 10% of the purchase price – whichever is less. The best thing is you don’t have to wait to get your money. Did you know that if you buy a house between Jan1 2009 and Nov 30th 2009 the government will give you up to $8,000 or 10% of the purchase price – whichever is less. The best thing is you don’t have to wait to get your money.

]]> By: Sandy http://credit-blog.creditfyi.com/real-estate/stop-foreclosure-with-this-legal-defense.html/comment-page-1#comment-173 Sandy Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:41:42 +0000 http://credit-blog.creditfyi.com/?p=1037#comment-173 I totally agree and I think that April's approach is admirable. Why should a bank get to take a house back that they don't legally own and resell it while the buyer who was ripped off on sub prime rates and predatory lending tactics, lose it? Who do you think God would want to own the house, considering that neither has legal claims to it? Her tactic is changing the epidemic and that's why the government wanted to get involved. Do you think that the Feds didn't see this coming? Hmmmm. I totally agree and I think that April’s approach is admirable. Why should a bank get to take a house back that they don’t legally own and resell it while the buyer who was ripped off on sub prime rates and predatory lending tactics, lose it? Who do you think God would want to own the house, considering that neither has legal claims to it? Her tactic is changing the epidemic and that’s why the government wanted to get involved. Do you think that the Feds didn’t see this coming? Hmmmm.

]]>